From a religious standpoint, the first commandment ever given to the human race was to Adam and Eve concerning there marriage and their God given procreative power. Regardless of what technological advancements might have taken place since then, humans were never physiologically designed to procreate with members of the same gender.
Guarantees Social Issue Essay Sample: Summary Reflecrion About Polygamy and Gay Marriage There has been a ranging debate as to whether polygamy or same-sex marriage should be legalized in the United States or not.
Contemporary philosophers such as Judith Stacey basing their arguments on research conducted from different countries have argued that decriminalizing polygamy and same-sex marriages or matrilineal child-rearing are the most badly destructive course for any society.
She therefore advocates for the removal of policies or regulations that are constituted to regulate the forms of acceptable family settings and marriage organizations especially in U. In the book, Unhitched: In this regard, Stacey plainly indicates that contemporary families seems to have come from a variety of forms and therefore, it is an illusion that one can adequately find morphological definition of the term family p.
In most cases, anthropology and sociology have been used in pointing out to heterosexual, nuclear, and monogamous families which are all perceived as normal organizations in Western societies. However, in this book, two types of families that are not well known even through enlarged imagination of families are explored.
The first category of the families is that which compose of families created by individuals that belong to sexual minorities. Such individuals pursue their own models of the family shared life and parenting with others.
Secondly, the reader is made to be familiar with contemporary matriarchal family that forms part of Mosou minority families living in West China. By considering family diversity in United States, South Africa, and China, the author helps the reader to gain more understanding on the variety of construction of families and intimacies that exist in this Gay marriages and family values age.
It is in this regard that this paper finds it essential to review this book. One of the reasons as to why Stacey wrote this book was to make the readers know that in order to understand families, the many forms of intimacies as well as the existing forms of inequalities generated and exacerbated by the marriage-based system of organizing families must be recognized.
This is the reason why in the first two chapters of the book, she looks at families from a marriage-like partnership as well as parenting between two or more partners in the United States.
This chapter tells stories of several gay men whom Stacey has followed up over decades to enable her gain more understanding of the evolution of gay families.
Unlike the s and 80s where gay or lesbian wedding or family was regarded as unusual, through the acknowledgment of the sexual desire in pursuit of romantic for long-term partnership with or without aim of raising children, gay families have evolved into another normal set of families in this contemporary world.
Based on her contributions above, it is clear that the author wanted to establish that, given their places on the fringe of the society, gays are more likely to accept their erotic identifiers even if they are culturally pressured to conform to the norms of monogamy.
Stacey argues that since gay males lack biological equipment, conventional institution, and legal resources for forging families because they are not subjected to formal socialization associated with famine labors, they can only pursue masculine erotic desires without any cultural hope that a child can appear p.
This is the reason why, unlike the cultural constrained, gay men are more likely to pursue sex across social boundaries of races, education, age, income, language, nationality, and religion.
Conspicuous in this chapter is how the author treats parenthood among gay men who raised families or partner with others against the odds. It is clear from this chapter that gay-parent families have challenged the widely held prejudice about the necessity of both a father and a mother.
For instance, Stacey gives out stories of gay men who were able to bring up children either on their own or with the help of male partners. In this case, the author wants to bring to the attention of the reader the fact that there seems to be underlying social forces that have contributed to the decline of conventional paternity where a child is raised by both father and a mother.
It is such forces that have led to the emerging new form of paternity. Significantly, the fact that having children today imposes economic and social responsibilities on parents means that most men and women who decide to have children do not do so for economic advantage as previously known, but mainly for their emotional needs.
Unlike the social character of paternity where a married woman who have given birth has her husband being presumed as the legal father of the child, gay male paternity seems to emphasize on the social aspect rather than on a biological basis in defining parenthood.
In this case, some gay men have provided sperms to their female friends or relatives or even pioneered other forms of surrogacy, extended parenthood, just to ensure that they can be as well are presumed as the legal fathers of the resulting children p.
Stacey notes that since the route to genetic parenthood for gay men is very expensive, most of them do pursue purely social paths of adoption or foster caring p. This is why majority of gays do foster and adopt children of varying ages across all manner of racial, social, national, physical, religious, and emotional boundaries.
Whereas polygamy, traditional form of family life, is banned and generally considered depraved within United States family organization, it seems that is amongst the oldest as well as the most practiced family organization especially in South Africa.Jun 26, · The gay petitioners seek the “profound commitment” of marriage, and same-sex marriage is important precisely because “marriage is a keystone of our social order” that “safeguards.
Jan 19, · The most conservative, family-affirming vote the Washington Legislature could cast would be to legalize same-sex marriage. A strong endorsement of community, personal responsibility and commitment.
Homosexual community, gay marriage, sexual and family values Why Are There Homosexuals? There are, of course, many psychological and physiological factors that would contribute to a boy’s orienting and identifying himself with homosexuality.
The most conservative, family-affirming vote the Washington Legislature could cast would be to legalize same-sex marriage. A strong endorsement of community, personal responsibility and commitment.
Same Sex Marriage on Family Values. The institution of marriage exists many centuries, but varies from year to year. In the near future, several countries in Europe are going to legalize gay marriages. For example, in July the Government of Luxembourg and Albania unveiled the intention to give legal status to same-sex marriages.
Gay Marriages and Family Values At the very heart of the debate about same-sex marriage is the definition of the word "marriage".
To some people, it changes to meet social and economic needs, to others it remains firmly fixed.