Military relations As part of its Plan Colombia program, the United States government currently provides hundreds of millions of dollars per year of military aidtraining, and equipment to Colombia,  to fight left-wing guerrillas such as the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia FARC-EPwhich has been accused of being involved in drug trafficking. DynCorpthe largest private company involved, was among those contracted by the State Department, while others signed contracts with the Defense Department.
Other issues Illicit drugs: It attracts criminal organizations because the potential profits are significantly more than from other criminal commodities: As the report notes p. It is also a global issue because profits [from illicit drugs] accrue to a wide range of actors, from poor rural farmers to affluent urban dealers.
But, in many instances, the single most profitable sector of the market is the process of transporting the drugs internationally.
The funds raised by trafficking groups can be used to underwrite other criminal activity and even political insurgency. The UN estimates that some million people 4. Back to top Legal and Illegal Drugs A lot of effort goes into tackling illegal drugs, but there are some legal drugs that affect far more people worldwide than illegal drugs: Tobacco and alcohol are considered drugs by health professionals even though these ones are legal and usually regulated in some way.
In that context, drug use of some sort, such as alcohol and marijuana, has been common throughout the history of human civilization. It seems that people like to consume mind-altering substances even though there may be serious health implications associated with many of these drugs.
But today, there is also the criminal element that drugs attract. Back to top Tackling the problem: A common approach and one taken by countries such as the United States and international organizations such as the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime is that drugs should be made illegal and there should be strong emphasis on clamping down on the illegal drugs trade.
In many countries, this has led to extra law-enforcement costs and overflowing prisons. The drugs problem is seen as a criminal issue. The Netherlands, however, has taken a different approach and partly decriminalized certain soft drugs in small proportions. The drugs problem is seen primarily as a health issue.
This has had a knock-on effect of drug tourism where some tourists go there to get substances. Should illegal drugs be decriminalized?
The prestigious British Medical Journal BMJ provided some interesting insights into the question of whether drugs should be decriminalized or not: Legalizing them risks increasing their availability: Drugs are not dangerous because they are illegal; they are illegal because they are dangerous.
A child who reaches age 21 without smoking, misusing alcohol, or using illegal drugs is virtually certain to never do so. Legalization and decriminalization—policies certain to increase illegal drug availability and use among our children—hardly qualify as public health approaches.
Joseph A Califano, Jr, Should drugs be decriminalised? NoBMJ, Kailash Chand argues that drugs should be decriminalized because drugs drive crime: Many people may think that taking drugs is inherently wrong and so should be illegal.
But there is a question of effectiveness—does making it illegal stop people doing it? The answer is clearly no. One could even argue that legalization would eliminate part of the attraction of taking drugs—the allure of doing something illegal.
In the UK we have cut off huge swathes of the population, branding them criminals and creating an underclass of people who no longer feel part of our society. A sensible policy of regulation and control would reduce burglary, cut gun crime, bring women off the streets, clear out our overflowing prisons, and raise billions in tax revenues.
Drug users could buy from places where they could be sure the drugs had not been cut with dangerous, cost saving chemicals. There would be clear information about the risks involved and guidance on how to seek treatment. It is time to allow adults the freedom to make decisions about the harmful substances they consume.
Kailash Chand, Should drugs be decriminalised? YesBMJ, Back to top Supply and demand The approach Califano advocates is to help people understand what they are doing i. Just recently, the UN accused celebrities of often being involved in illicit drug trafficking or illegal drug use and that it is often glamorized.
They fear that this may send out the wrong message to young people, too. In addition, they accused some countries off letting celebrities drug-takers off too lightly when caught.If Obama and Kerlikowske sit back, let the states work as laboratories for drug-law changes, and focus simply on changing the tenor of the discussion in D.C.
while also achieving a few modest federal policy reforms, it will, in fact, amount to a significant change. The U.S. Senate race between Ted Cruz and Beto O’Rourke is trending into new territory: the war on plombier-nemours.com is a familiar topic for O’Rourke, a Democratic congressman who has earned a national.
These circumstances led more than 1, world leaders, including Bernie Sanders, to call for an end to the "disastrous" war on drugs in a recent letter to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. But what exactly does it mean to end the war on drugs?
Surely, almost no one wants to see cocaine or heroin sold at CVS. Medical marijuana is now legal in 13 states, and California Gov.
Arnold Schwarzenegger last month welcomed a public debate about proposals to legalize and tax the drug. Four Presidents have personally waged war on drugs.
Unfortunately, it is a war that we are losing. Drug abusers continue to fill our courts, hospitals, and prisons. The drug trade causes violent crime that ravages our neighborhoods.
Children of drug abusers are neglected, abused, and even abandoned. The United States has been fighting the so-called “War on Drugs” since the final days of the Nixon administration.
46 years later, it is a war that has been lost. The moral argument for keeping drugs illegal has been shared by both Republican and Democratic administrations for the past half century – that legalization is immoral and a detriment to a society of laws.